Is Inkling a good deal?

Whether anything in this catalogue beats Inkling on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.

12 undominated of 145 · Oct 6, 2026

As of Oct 6, 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher and costs less than Inkling for Balanced on LMArena, but it is not a drop-in. You would give up: max output.

Inspect model evidence Compare differences & requirements

Current model

Inkling

Balanced

3 tokens in per 1 out

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 49.2 points higher and costs 69% less, but you would give up: max output.

Inkling

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1441.8

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$1.73/M

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1491.0

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$0.540/M

Inkling takes text, image, audio, returns up to 262,144 tokens from a 524,288-token context, and is listed by 2 sellers.

Compared against 145 rated, priced models on this lens: nothing dominates it outright, 5 more dominate it but give something up. Inkling scores 1441.8 at $1.73 per million tokens for this mix.

Higher score, lower price, named losses

Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou give up
MiMo-V2.6-Pro1491.0$0.540/Mmax output
Gemini 3.6 Flash1479.5$1.50/Mmax output
GLM 5.31471.4$1.00/Mimage, audio
GLM 5.21470.4$1.12/Mmax output, image, audio
GLM 5.3 Flash1469.6$0.238/Maudio
Inkling1441.8 · $1.73/MLMArena EloEffective $/M · Balanced
145 rated, priced standard models. Chartreuse is the frontier. Cobalt is the model you named, when it is not on the staircase.

Open the frontier

The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.

Saved decision references

Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.

Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.

Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.

Evidence & Ask