Is GPT-5.4 Nano a good deal?

Whether anything in this catalogue beats GPT-5.4 Nano on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.

13 undominated of 136 · Sep 23, 2026

As of Sep 23, 2026, GPT-5.4 Nano is dominated for Balanced on LMArena. GPT-5.6 Luna scores 57.0 higher and costs 3% less, with a covering envelope. 13 of 136 rated, priced standard models are undominated.

Inspect model evidence Compare differences & requirements

Current model

GPT-5.4 Nano

Balanced

3 tokens in per 1 out

GPT-5.6 Luna is both better and cheaper than GPT-5.4 Nano: 57.0 points higher on LMArena and 3% less per million tokens, $0.01 cheaper at this mix.

GPT-5.4 Nano

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1372.9

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$0.463/M

GPT-5.6 Luna

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1429.9

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$0.450/M

GPT-5.4 Nano takes file, image, text, returns up to 128,000 tokens from a 400,000-token context, and is listed by 4 sellers.

Compared against 136 rated, priced models on this lens: 1 model dominates it and gives up nothing, 5 more dominate it but give something up. GPT-5.4 Nano scores 1372.9 at $0.46 per million tokens for this mix.

Envelope-safe replacements

Each row scores at least as high, costs no more, and covers this model’s context, output, modalities, tools, and reasoning. A cheaper narrower model is not listed here.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou save
GPT-5.6 Luna1429.9 +57.0$0.450/M3%

Higher score, lower price, named losses

Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou give up
GLM 5.3 Flash1471.9$0.237/Mfile
Gemma 4 31B1441.7$0.153/Mcontext, max output, file
Hy31440.6$0.144/Mcontext, file, image
Gemma 4 26B A4B 1434.5$0.143/Mcontext, file
DeepSeek V4 Flash 04231431.8$0.103/Mfile, image
GPT-5.6 Luna1429.9 · $0.450/MGPT-5.4 Nano1372.9 · $0.463/MLMArena EloEffective $/M · Balanced
136 rated, priced standard models. Chartreuse is the frontier. Cobalt is the model you named, when it is not on the staircase.

Open the frontier

The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.

Saved decision references

Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.

Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.

Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.

Evidence & Ask