Cheaper alternatives to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta LMArena 1274.9 $0.710/M on a balanced workload prices as of 2026-08-28
33 models are both better and cheaper, giving up nothing.
Of the 133 models carrying both an independent score and a published price at the same delivery mode, 71 score at least as high as Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and cost no more under at least one workload. 33 match or beat it on every capability we hold — context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and extended reasoning. 38 do not, and every row names what it drops.
Dominance is not a property of a model. It is a property of a model, a capability lens and a workload, and all three are named on every row. Scores are LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset; prices are blended per million tokens. A higher score is not a drop-in replacement.
This page is built from that comparison and nothing else. When no model is both better and cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, it is not generated.
Where it holds
| Workload | Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $/M | Better and cheaper | With a trade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | $0.710 | 24 | 25 |
| Summarise | $0.710 | 33 | 38 |
| Chat | $0.710 | 23 | 22 |
| Code gen | $0.710 | 14 | 19 |
| Agentic | $0.710 | 32 | 35 |
Workload mixes are defined on the methodology page. Cached input is priced at the cached rate, and reasoning tokens at the worse of the reasoning and output rates.
What you would be replacing
| Intelligence | 1274.9 |
|---|---|
| Context window | 131K |
| Max output | 115K |
| Input modes | text |
| Tool use | yes |
| Extended reasoning | no |
A replacement has to clear every line above, not just the score. Full record for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
Better and cheaper, nothing given up 33
Each of these matches or beats Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and reasoning, scores at least as high, and costs no more.
| # | Model | Intelligence | $/M | Holds under |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi | 1465 +190.1 | $0.544 |
|
| 2 | Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen | 1456.2 +181.3 | $0.560 |
|
| 3 | Hy3 Tencent | 1441.2 +166.3 | $0.144 |
|
| 4 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 DeepSeek | 1431.6 +156.7 | $0.101 |
|
| 5 | MiniMax M3 MiniMax | 1434.8 +159.9 | $0.525 |
|
| 6 | MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi | 1427.3 +152.4 | $0.175 |
|
| 7 | GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI | 1428.5 +153.6 | $0.450 |
|
| 8 | DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek | 1424.6 +149.7 | $0.290 |
|
| 9 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Qwen | 1418.6 +143.7 | $0.350 |
|
| 10 | Inkling Small Thinking Machines | 1411.7 +136.8 | $0.637 |
|
| 11 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax | 1405.3 +130.4 | $0.525 |
|
| 12 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen | 1395.6 +120.7 | $0.500 |
|
| 13 | Solar Pro 4 Upstage | 1376.2 +101.3 | $0.052 |
|
| 14 | DeepSeek V3 0324 DeepSeek | 1375 +100.1 | $0.438 |
|
| 15 | GPT-5.4 Nano OpenAI | 1372.8 +97.9 | $0.463 |
|
| 16 | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI | 1365.6 +90.7 | $0.070 |
|
| 17 | GPT-5 Mini OpenAI | 1373.4 +98.5 | $0.688 |
|
| 18 | Gemma 3 27B Google | 1358.3 +83.4 | $0.172 |
|
| 19 | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax | 1359 +84.1 | $0.472 |
|
| 20 | Trinity Large Thinking Arcee | 1341.9 +67 | $0.378 |
|
| 21 | MiniMax M2 MiniMax | 1342.1 +67.2 | $0.446 |
|
| 22 | GPT-5 Nano OpenAI | 1320.3 +45.4 | $0.138 |
|
| 23 | Granite 4.1 8B IBM | 1291.6 +16.7 | $0.063 |
|
| 24 | gpt-oss-20b OpenAI | 1287.8 +12.9 | $0.055 |
|
| 25 | Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI | 1445.2 +170.3 | $0.432 summarise |
|
| 26 | GLM 5 Z.ai | 1445.2 +170.3 | $0.529 summarise |
|
| 27 | Qwen3.8 27B Qwen | 1440.8 +165.9 | $0.434 summarise |
|
| 28 | GLM 4.6 Z.ai | 1439.8 +164.9 | $0.461 summarise |
|
| 29 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 DeepSeek | 1439.2 +164.3 | $0.686 summarise |
|
| 30 | GLM 4.7 Z.ai | 1435.3 +160.4 | $0.376 summarise |
|
| 31 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen | 1417.9 +143 | $0.351 summarise |
|
| 32 | DeepSeek V3.1 DeepSeek | 1419.1 +144.2 | $0.605 summarise |
|
| 33 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Qwen | 1413.8 +138.9 | $0.334 summarise |
|
Cheaper and higher-scoring, but you give something up 38
These score at least as high and cost no more on the two plotted axes, and lose something that is not on them. Read the last column before switching.
| Model | Intelligence | $/M | Holds under | What you give up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B Google | 1441.7 +166.8 | $0.152 |
|
|
| Gemma 4 26B A4B Google | 1434.6 +159.7 | $0.138 |
|
|
| DeepSeek V3.2 Exp DeepSeek | 1424.4 +149.5 | $0.305 |
|
|
| Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Qwen | 1419.3 +144.4 | $0.205 |
|
|
| DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek | 1419.6 +144.7 | $0.453 |
|
|
| Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Qwen | 1420.9 +146 | $0.632 |
|
|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Google | 1414.8 +139.9 | $0.563 |
|
|
| Step 3.5 Flash StepFun | 1403.8 +128.9 | $0.150 |
|
|
| Qwen3.5-27B Qwen | 1407.9 +133 | $0.536 |
|
|
| Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen | 1397.6 +122.7 | $0.114 |
|
|
| Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Qwen | 1384.3 +109.4 | $0.084 |
|
|
| GLM 4.5 Air Z.ai | 1382.8 +107.9 | $0.310 |
|
|
| GLM 4.6V Z.ai | 1374.7 +99.8 | $0.450 |
|
|
| Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Qwen | 1367.5 +92.6 | $0.412 |
|
|
| Mercury 2 Inception | 1357.8 +82.9 | $0.375 |
|
|
| GLM 4.7 Flash Z.ai | 1352.9 +78 | $0.145 |
|
|
| Qwen3 32B Qwen | 1340.1 +65.2 | $0.130 |
|
|
| Gemma 3 12B Google | 1334.2 +59.3 | $0.075 |
|
|
| GPT-4.1 Mini OpenAI | 1340.5 +65.6 | $0.700 |
|
|
| DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek | 1332.6 +57.7 | $0.450 |
|
|
| Qwen3 30B A3B Qwen | 1316.9 +42 | $0.215 |
|
|
| Olmo 3 32B Think Allen AI | 1298.5 +23.6 | $0.237 |
|
|
| Gemma 3 4B Google | 1290.8 +15.9 | $0.063 |
|
|
| GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) OpenAI | 1286.6 +11.7 | $0.263 |
|
|
| GPT-4.1 Nano OpenAI | 1284.8 tie | $0.175 |
|
|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash Google | 1490.2 +215.3 | $0.354 summarise |
|
|
| Gemini 3.6 Flash Google | 1476.5 +201.6 | $0.708 summarise |
|
|
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google | 1436.5 +161.6 | $0.333 summarise |
|
|
| Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen | 1438.3 +163.4 | $0.487 summarise |
|
|
| Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen | 1436.8 +161.9 | $0.406 summarise |
|
|
| GLM 4.5 Z.ai | 1429.4 +154.5 | $0.540 summarise |
|
|
| R1 0528 DeepSeek | 1427.9 +153 | $0.540 summarise |
|
|
| Gemini 2.5 Flash Google | 1417.3 +142.4 | $0.333 summarise |
|
|
| Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Qwen | 1400.6 +125.7 | $0.580 summarise |
|
|
| Qwen3 235B A22B Qwen | 1366 +91.1 | $0.523 summarise |
|
|
| Nova 2 Lite Amazon | 1362.2 +87.3 | $0.410 summarise |
|
|
| MiniMax M1 MiniMax | 1341.9 +67 | $0.632 summarise |
|
|
| GLM 4.5V Z.ai | 1333.6 +58.7 | $0.520 summarise |
|
|
What this compares, and what it leaves out
- Quality is LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset. The 95% confidence interval on a difference between two scores is about ±10.68 points, so a gap smaller than that is marked tie rather than an improvement — see significance bands.
- 188 further models at this delivery mode carry a price but no independent score. They are absent from the comparison in both directions — unrated is not a zero, and an unmeasured model is neither an alternative nor a worse buy.
- Retired models are never offered as an alternative, and a model only competes against its own delivery mode: batch trades latency for price, so it is not a like-for-like swap.
- Nothing here measures latency, throughput, rate limits or how a model behaves on your prompts. Two models with the same index score are not interchangeable.
- The models that nothing beats on both axes are on the value frontier, and every other model something cheaper beats is listed here.