Cheaper alternatives to MiniMax M1

MiniMax LMArena 1341.9 $0.963/M on a balanced workload prices as of 2026-08-28

16 models are both better and cheaper, giving up nothing.

Of the 133 models carrying both an independent score and a published price at the same delivery mode, 56 score at least as high as MiniMax M1 and cost no more under at least one workload. 16 match or beat it on every capability we hold — context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and extended reasoning. 40 do not, and every row names what it drops.

Dominance is not a property of a model. It is a property of a model, a capability lens and a workload, and all three are named on every row. Scores are LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset; prices are blended per million tokens. A higher score is not a drop-in replacement.

This page is built from that comparison and nothing else. When no model is both better and cheaper than MiniMax M1, it is not generated.

Where it holds

WorkloadMiniMax M1 $/MBetter and cheaperWith a trade
Balanced$0.9631538
Summarise$0.6321540
Chat$1.211639
Code gen$1.541238
Agentic$0.7971639

Workload mixes are defined on the methodology page. Cached input is priced at the cached rate, and reasoning tokens at the worse of the reasoning and output rates.

What you would be replacing

Intelligence1341.9
Context window1M
Max output40K
Input modestext
Tool useyes
Extended reasoningyes

A replacement has to clear every line above, not just the score. Full record for MiniMax M1.

Better and cheaper, nothing given up 16

Each of these matches or beats MiniMax M1 on context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and reasoning, scores at least as high, and costs no more.

#ModelIntelligence$/MHolds under
1Gemini 3.7 Flash Google1490.2 +148.3$0.750
  • Balanced −22%
  • Summarise −44%
  • Chat −28%
  • Code gen −19%
  • Agentic −50%
2MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi1465 +123.1$0.544
  • Balanced −44%
  • Summarise −47%
  • Chat −60%
  • Code gen −57%
  • Agentic −69%
3Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen1456.2 +114.3$0.560
  • Balanced −42%
  • Summarise −53%
  • Chat −48%
  • Code gen −43%
  • Agentic −61%
4Qwen3.8 27B Qwen1440.8 +98.9$0.956
  • Balanced −1%
  • Summarise −31%
  • Chat −3%
  • Agentic −32%
5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 DeepSeek1431.6 +89.7$0.101
  • Balanced −89%
  • Summarise −89%
  • Chat −92%
  • Code gen −92%
  • Agentic −93%
6MiniMax M3 MiniMax1434.8 +92.9$0.525
  • Balanced −45%
  • Summarise −56%
  • Chat −51%
  • Code gen −47%
  • Agentic −63%
7Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen1436.8 +94.9$0.731
  • Balanced −24%
  • Summarise −36%
  • Chat −19%
  • Code gen −16%
  • Agentic −29%
8Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google1436.5 +94.6$0.850
  • Balanced −12%
  • Summarise −47%
  • Chat −9%
  • Agentic −41%
9MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi1427.3 +85.4$0.175
  • Balanced −82%
  • Summarise −83%
  • Chat −87%
  • Code gen −86%
  • Agentic −90%
10GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI1428.5 +86.6$0.450
  • Balanced −53%
  • Summarise −69%
  • Chat −55%
  • Code gen −49%
  • Agentic −70%
11Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Google1414.8 +72.9$0.563
  • Balanced −42%
  • Summarise −61%
  • Chat −44%
  • Code gen −36%
  • Agentic −62%
12Gemini 2.5 Flash Google1417.3 +75.4$0.850
  • Balanced −12%
  • Summarise −47%
  • Chat −9%
  • Agentic −41%
13Inkling Small Thinking Machines1411.7 +69.8$0.637
  • Balanced −34%
  • Summarise −39%
  • Chat −47%
  • Code gen −43%
  • Agentic −56%
14Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen1397.6 +55.7$0.114
  • Balanced −88%
  • Summarise −88%
  • Chat −88%
  • Code gen −88%
  • Agentic −88%
15Nova 2 Lite Amazon1362.2 +20.3$0.850
  • Balanced −12%
  • Summarise −35%
  • Chat −2%
  • Agentic −21%
16DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 DeepSeek1439.2 +97.3$0.979 chat
  • Chat −19%
  • Code gen −14%
  • Agentic −34%

Cheaper and higher-scoring, but you give something up 40

These score at least as high and cost no more on the two plotted axes, and lose something that is not on them. Read the last column before switching.

ModelIntelligence$/MHolds underWhat you give up
Gemma 4 31B Google1441.7 +99.8$0.152
  • Balanced −84%
  • Summarise −86%
  • Chat −85%
  • Code gen −85%
  • Agentic −87%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 16K max output
Hy3 Tencent1441.2 +99.3$0.144
  • Balanced −85%
  • Summarise −88%
  • Chat −87%
  • Code gen −85%
  • Agentic −90%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI1445.2 +103.3$0.900
  • Balanced −6%
  • Summarise −32%
  • Chat −13%
  • Code gen −3%
  • Agentic −38%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
GLM 5 Z.ai1445.2 +103.3$0.930
  • Balanced −3%
  • Summarise −16%
  • Chat −19%
  • Code gen −12%
  • Agentic −36%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
Gemma 4 26B A4B Google1434.6 +92.7$0.138
  • Balanced −86%
  • Summarise −87%
  • Chat −85%
  • Code gen −85%
  • Agentic −86%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 16K max output
GLM 4.6 Z.ai1439.8 +97.9$0.875
  • Balanced −9%
  • Summarise −27%
  • Chat −19%
  • Code gen −11%
  • Agentic −39%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen1438.3 +96.4$0.877
  • Balanced −9%
  • Summarise −23%
  • Chat −3%
  • Agentic −14%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
GLM 4.7 Z.ai1435.3 +93.4$0.738
  • Balanced −23%
  • Summarise −41%
  • Chat −30%
  • Code gen −23%
  • Agentic −48%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek1424.6 +82.7$0.290
  • Balanced −70%
  • Summarise −64%
  • Chat −78%
  • Code gen −79%
  • Agentic −75%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp DeepSeek1424.4 +82.5$0.305
  • Balanced −68%
  • Summarise −56%
  • Chat −73%
  • Code gen −77%
  • Agentic −64%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
R1 0528 DeepSeek1427.9 +86$0.912
  • Balanced −5%
  • Summarise −15%
  • Chat −8%
  • Code gen −4%
  • Agentic −17%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
  • 40K → 33K max output
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Qwen1419.3 +77.4$0.205
  • Balanced −79%
  • Summarise −82%
  • Chat −77%
  • Code gen −76%
  • Agentic −80%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 16K max output
  • no extended reasoning
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct Qwen1418.6 +76.7$0.350
  • Balanced −64%
  • Summarise −78%
  • Chat −59%
  • Code gen −55%
  • Agentic −71%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • no extended reasoning
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek1419.6 +77.7$0.453
  • Balanced −53%
  • Summarise −58%
  • Chat −57%
  • Code gen −55%
  • Agentic −62%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
  • 40K → 33K max output
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Qwen1420.9 +79$0.632
  • Balanced −34%
  • Summarise −58%
  • Chat −30%
  • Code gen −21%
  • Agentic −50%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 33K max output
  • no extended reasoning
DeepSeek V3.1 DeepSeek1419.1 +77.2$0.825
  • Balanced −14%
  • Summarise −4%
  • Chat −18%
  • Code gen −21%
  • Agentic −10%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen1417.9 +76$0.715
  • Balanced −26%
  • Summarise −45%
  • Chat −18%
  • Code gen −12%
  • Agentic −33%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Qwen1413.8 +71.9$0.748
  • Balanced −22%
  • Summarise −47%
  • Chat −13%
  • Code gen −4%
  • Agentic −32%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
Qwen3.5-27B Qwen1407.9 +66$0.536
  • Balanced −44%
  • Summarise −58%
  • Chat −39%
  • Code gen −34%
  • Agentic −50%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
Step 3.5 Flash StepFun1403.8 +61.9$0.150
  • Balanced −84%
  • Summarise −83%
  • Chat −85%
  • Code gen −86%
  • Agentic −84%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax1405.3 +63.4$0.525
  • Balanced −45%
  • Summarise −56%
  • Chat −51%
  • Code gen −47%
  • Agentic −63%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen1395.6 +53.7$0.500
  • Balanced −48%
  • Summarise −53%
  • Chat −46%
  • Code gen −45%
  • Agentic −50%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Qwen1384.3 +42.4$0.084
  • Balanced −91%
  • Summarise −91%
  • Chat −91%
  • Code gen −91%
  • Agentic −91%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 32K max output
  • no extended reasoning
GLM 4.5 Air Z.ai1382.8 +40.9$0.310
  • Balanced −68%
  • Summarise −78%
  • Chat −68%
  • Code gen −64%
  • Agentic −78%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
Solar Pro 4 Upstage1376.2 +34.3$0.052
  • Balanced −95%
  • Summarise −96%
  • Chat −95%
  • Code gen −95%
  • Agentic −96%
  • 1.0M → 524K context
DeepSeek V3 0324 DeepSeek1375 +33.1$0.438
  • Balanced −55%
  • Summarise −55%
  • Chat −55%
  • Code gen −55%
  • Agentic −55%
  • 1.0M → 164K context
  • no extended reasoning
GLM 4.6V Z.ai1374.7 +32.8$0.450
  • Balanced −53%
  • Summarise −59%
  • Chat −61%
  • Code gen −58%
  • Agentic −69%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
  • 40K → 33K max output
GPT-5.4 Nano OpenAI1372.8 +30.9$0.463
  • Balanced −52%
  • Summarise −68%
  • Chat −53%
  • Code gen −47%
  • Agentic −69%
  • 1.0M → 400K context
GPT-5 Mini OpenAI1373.4 +31.5$0.688
  • Balanced −29%
  • Summarise −57%
  • Chat −27%
  • Code gen −17%
  • Agentic −53%
  • 1.0M → 400K context
gpt-oss-120b OpenAI1365.6 +23.7$0.070
  • Balanced −93%
  • Summarise −93%
  • Chat −93%
  • Code gen −92%
  • Agentic −93%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Qwen1367.5 +25.6$0.412
  • Balanced −57%
  • Summarise −68%
  • Chat −53%
  • Code gen −49%
  • Agentic −61%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • 40K → 33K max output
Qwen3 235B A22B Qwen1366 +24.1$0.796
  • Balanced −17%
  • Summarise −17%
  • Chat −17%
  • Code gen −17%
  • Agentic −17%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
  • 40K → 8K max output
Gemma 3 27B Google1358.3 +16.4$0.172
  • Balanced −82%
  • Summarise −86%
  • Chat −82%
  • Code gen −81%
  • Agentic −86%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
  • no extended reasoning
MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax1359 +17.1$0.472
  • Balanced −51%
  • Summarise −62%
  • Chat −57%
  • Code gen −52%
  • Agentic −69%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
Mercury 2 Inception1357.8 +15.9$0.375
  • Balanced −61%
  • Summarise −67%
  • Chat −68%
  • Code gen −65%
  • Agentic −76%
  • 1.0M → 128K context
GLM 4.7 Flash Z.ai1352.9 +11$0.145
  • Balanced −85%
  • Summarise −90%
  • Chat −85%
  • Code gen −83%
  • Agentic −90%
  • 1.0M → 203K context
  • 40K → 16K max output
Trinity Large Thinking Arcee1341.9 tie$0.378
  • Balanced −61%
  • Summarise −67%
  • Chat −65%
  • Code gen −62%
  • Agentic −73%
  • 1.0M → 262K context
MiniMax M2 MiniMax1342.1 tie$0.446
  • Balanced −54%
  • Summarise −54%
  • Chat −54%
  • Code gen −54%
  • Agentic −54%
  • 1.0M → 205K context
GLM 4.5 Z.ai1429.4 +87.5$0.540 summarise
  • Summarise −15%
  • Chat −10%
  • Code gen −1%
  • Agentic −31%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Qwen1400.6 +58.7$0.580 summarise
  • Summarise −8%
  • 1.0M → 131K context
  • 40K → 33K max output

What this compares, and what it leaves out

  • Quality is LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset. The 95% confidence interval on a difference between two scores is about ±10.68 points, so a gap smaller than that is marked tie rather than an improvement — see significance bands.
  • 188 further models at this delivery mode carry a price but no independent score. They are absent from the comparison in both directions — unrated is not a zero, and an unmeasured model is neither an alternative nor a worse buy.
  • Retired models are never offered as an alternative, and a model only competes against its own delivery mode: batch trades latency for price, so it is not a like-for-like swap.
  • Nothing here measures latency, throughput, rate limits or how a model behaves on your prompts. Two models with the same index score are not interchangeable.
  • The models that nothing beats on both axes are on the value frontier, and every other model something cheaper beats is listed here.