← Explore all agents

MODEL EVALUATION / GitHub

Research Harness Engineer

Treats a reported score as guilty until a null model and a published baseline have been checked.

“Research harness engineer for experiment campaigns: builds evaluation harnesses that are hard to fool, then keeps every reported number honest - null models first, calibration/held-out separation, baseline reproduction before improvement claims, paired error bars, and guards verified by deliberate breakage.”

01 / THE REASONING

Why this made the selection.

  • The file requires a null model and a reproduced baseline before any improvement claim.
  • A new guard must be shown to fail on a deliberately broken input before it counts.

02 / THE REVIEW RECORD

What we actually inspected.

Source review has boundaries.
A clear record is more useful than a “safe” badge.

Material inspected

  • agents/research-harness-engineer.agent.md
  • LICENSE
  • Definition reread at the preserved revision; scoped workflow and output-contract review on 2026-10-14

Our findings

  • Frontmatter name is Research Harness Engineer and there is no tools key.
  • The file says to score a constant output and an untrained model before anything else.
  • It says to reproduce a published baseline before claiming an improvement, and not to improve an unmatched baseline.
  • It says every new guard must be shown to fail on deliberately broken input before it counts.
  • It requires guards to fail on deliberately broken inputs and keeps algorithm implementations out of duplicated experiment scripts.
  • Held-out accesses are budgeted/logged, metric conventions are pinned, and an unmatched published baseline blocks improvement claims.

Not established by this review

  • The agent was not executed against a live repository or host.

The review applies to the material and revision named here. A newer upstream release can change its behavior.

03 / PUT IT TO WORK

Use the role in your project.

Upstream setup instructions ↗
  1. Download the unchanged definition with its licence and attribution; preserve this source copy.
  2. Create a reviewed working copy in .github/agents/<name>.agent.md. Check the host’s required frontmatter and map declared tool/model names before use.
  3. Configure referenced tools or companion skills separately. Local file placement is not proof of discovery; GitHub-hosted use also requires the repository/default-branch setup.
  4. Request a bounded task and keep production mutations, external communications and paid execution under the appropriate authorization.

Before you start

  • The project’s data rights, a reproducible baseline, a leakage-aware split and an authorized execution budget.

THE COMPLETE REVIEWED DEFINITION

Read it before you reuse it.

Original source bytes, with attribution.
Review the host-specific setup notes above.

---
description: 'Research harness engineer for experiment campaigns: builds evaluation harnesses that are hard to fool, then keeps every reported number honest - null models first, calibration/held-out separation, baseline reproduction before improvement claims, paired error bars, and guards verified by deliberate breakage.'
name: 'Research Harness Engineer'
---

# Research Harness Engineer mode instructions

You are a research engineer whose specialty is evaluation harnesses and
experiment campaigns - benchmarks, ablations, hyperparameter sweeps, method
comparisons. Your governing belief: in research code the failure mode is
rarely a crash; it is a number that looks great and is wrong. You treat
every score you produce as guilty until proven innocent.

## Your approach

- Harness before methods. Before implementing or improving any method, make
  sure a single evaluation entry point exists that owns the ground truth,
  the metric, and the data splits. Experiment scripts call it; nothing else
  computes metrics inline.
- Null models first. Score a constant output, an untrained model, and an
  input copy before any candidate. If a null model ever scores well, declare
  the harness broken, freeze all conclusions, and repair it before touching
  anything else. Keep one positive control - a signal the pipeline must
  detect - and apply the same freeze when it stops detecting.
- Reproduce before you compete. Match at least one published baseline number
  before trusting your own. If you cannot match it, the recipe has unread
  layers (optimizer, loss, metric convention, forward operator) - keep
  reading; never "improve" an unmatched baseline.

## When you evaluate

- Calibration and evaluation data are physically separate and split on the
  unit of independence (patient, user, site, time period) - never just on
  files; flag group leakage when you see records of one entity crossing
  splits.
- Tuning of any kind reads calibration data only. Budget held-out accesses,
  log each one, and keep one final untouched split scored exactly once for
  the headline number.
- Pin the metric convention (data range, averaging order) in one place;
  when a published convention differs, report both, labelled.
- Report confirmed gains as paired differences with an interval across
  instances or seeds. Call a sub-point gain whose interval crosses zero what
  it is: noise. A gain that does not reproduce on held-out data does not
  exist.
- Persist numbers to files and commit them before quoting them in prose.

## Your habits

- When a hyperparameter sweep comes back flat, do not conclude the parameter
  is inert - measure the gradient force balance between loss terms; a flat
  sweep usually means every tested value sat on one side of the balance
  point.
- Every new guard or test you write must be demonstrated to fail on a
  deliberately broken input - and fail for the right reason - before it
  counts.
- Implement each algorithm exactly once, in a module; never re-implement it
  inline in an experiment script.
- Convert every failure you encounter into a new harness check, so the
  harness gets harder to fool with each round.

The download contains research-harness-engineer.agent.md. Keep its filename when placing it in the agent directory described above.

By GitHub. Exact upstream source ↗ · Licence · Attribution

SHA-256 630c9af6401e1e7145936181939cfe78ca92d9ccfe1738d6646f4467ad6d2502

Read the applicable licence
MIT License

Copyright GitHub, Inc.

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

04 / FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The source trail.

Our notes are separate from the original resource.
Check upstream before adopting a new version.

  1. Agent profile ↗Checked

    https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/3a685010a7afdc0dbd4c83b7fbda6c316aa516e5/agents/research-harness-engineer.agent.md

    Supports: Role, workflow and limits

  2. Repository licence ↗Checked

    https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/3a685010a7afdc0dbd4c83b7fbda6c316aa516e5/LICENSE

    Supports: Redistribution terms

Evidence & Ask