Is Grok 4.3 a good deal?

Whether anything in this catalogue beats Grok 4.3 on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.

13 undominated of 136 · Sep 23, 2026

As of Sep 23, 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher and costs less than Grok 4.3 for Balanced on LMArena, but it is not a drop-in. You would give up: max output.

Inspect model evidence Compare differences & requirements

Current model

Grok 4.3

Balanced

3 tokens in per 1 out

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores 97.0 points higher and costs 4% less, but you would give up: max output.

Grok 4.3

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1397.7

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$1.56/M

Gemini 3.8 Flash

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1494.7

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$1.50/M

Grok 4.3 takes text, image, file, returns up to 900,000 tokens from a 1,000,000-token context, and is listed by 4 sellers.

Compared against 136 rated, priced models on this lens: nothing dominates it outright, 5 more dominate it but give something up. Grok 4.3 scores 1397.7 at $1.56 per million tokens for this mix.

Higher score, lower price, named losses

Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou give up
Gemini 3.8 Flash1494.7$1.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.7 Flash1490.5$1.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.6 Flash1476.1$1.50/Mmax output
GLM 5.31475.1$1.29/Mmax output, image, file
GLM 5.3 Flash1471.9$0.237/Mfile
Grok 4.31397.7 · $1.56/MLMArena EloEffective $/M · Balanced
136 rated, priced standard models. Chartreuse is the frontier. Cobalt is the model you named, when it is not on the staircase.

Open the frontier

The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.

Saved decision references

Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.

Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.

Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.

Evidence & Ask