Is o1 a good deal?

Whether anything in this catalogue beats o1 on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.

13 undominated of 136 · Sep 23, 2026

As of Sep 23, 2026, o1 is dominated for Balanced on LMArena. Claude Fable 5.1 scores 141.9 higher and costs 24% less, with a covering envelope. 13 of 136 rated, priced standard models are undominated.

Inspect model evidence Compare differences & requirements

Current model

o1

Balanced

3 tokens in per 1 out

Claude Fable 5.1 is both better and cheaper than o1: 141.9 points higher on LMArena and 24% less per million tokens, $6.25 cheaper at this mix.

o1

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1365.7

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$26.25/M

Claude Fable 5.1

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

1507.6

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

$20.00/M

o1 takes text, image, file, returns up to 100,000 tokens from a 200,000-token context, and is listed by 1 seller.

Compared against 136 rated, priced models on this lens: 27 models dominate it and give up nothing, 5 more dominate it but give something up. o1 scores 1365.7 at $26.25 per million tokens for this mix.

Envelope-safe replacements

Each row scores at least as high, costs no more, and covers this model’s context, output, modalities, tools, and reasoning. A cheaper narrower model is not listed here.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou save
Claude Fable 5.11507.6 +141.9$20.00/M24%
Claude Opus 51504.9 +139.2$10.00/M62%
Claude Opus 4.61503.0 +137.3$10.00/M62%
Claude Fable 51492.6 +126.9$20.00/M24%
Claude Opus 4.71490.0 +124.3$10.00/M62%
Muse Spark 1.31489.7 +124.0$2.00/M92%
Muse Spark 1.11480.2 +114.5$2.00/M92%
GPT-5.51465.6 +99.9$11.25/M57%
Claude Opus 4.81460.8 +95.1$10.00/M62%
Claude Sonnet 4.61458.3 +92.6$6.00/M77%
GPT-5.6 Sol1455.1 +89.4$4.00/M85%
GPT-5.41452.6 +86.9$5.63/M79%
Grok 4.51450.1 +84.4$3.00/M89%
GPT-5.6 Terra1446.2 +80.5$4.50/M83%
GPT-6 Astra1443.7 +78.0$20.00/M24%
Claude Sonnet 51442.2 +76.5$4.00/M85%
GPT-5.6 Luna1429.9 +64.2$0.450/M98%
Grok 4.61429.9 +64.2$3.00/M89%
GPT-5.11422.6 +56.9$3.44/M87%
Mistral Medium 3.51420.6 +54.9$3.00/M89%
GPT-5.21412.4 +46.7$4.81/M82%
GPT-5.4 Mini1412.1 +46.4$1.69/M94%
o31409.9 +44.2$3.50/M87%
GPT-51406.1 +40.4$3.44/M87%
Grok 4.31397.7 +32.0$1.56/M94%
GPT-5 Mini1373.0 +7.3$0.688/M97%
GPT-5.4 Nano1372.9 +7.2$0.463/M98%

Higher score, lower price, named losses

Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.

ModelLMArenaEffective $/MYou give up
Gemini 3.8 Flash1494.7$1.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.7 Flash1490.5$1.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1480.1$4.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.6 Flash1476.1$1.50/Mmax output
Gemini 3.5 Flash1475.7$3.38/Mmax output
Claude Fable 5.11507.6 · $20.00/Mo11365.7 · $26.25/MLMArena EloEffective $/M · Balanced
136 rated, priced standard models. Chartreuse is the frontier. Cobalt is the model you named, when it is not on the staircase.

Open the frontier

The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.

Saved decision references

Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.

Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.

Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.

Evidence & Ask