Is Muse Spark 1.1 a good deal?
Whether anything in this catalogue beats Muse Spark 1.1 on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.
13 undominated of 136 · Sep 23, 2026
As of Sep 23, 2026, Muse Spark 1.1 is dominated for Balanced on LMArena. Muse Spark 1.3 scores 9.5 higher at the same price, with a covering envelope. 13 of 136 rated, priced standard models are undominated.
Inspect model evidence Compare differences & requirements
Muse Spark 1.3 scores 9.5 points higher than Muse Spark 1.1 at the same price, $2.00 per million tokens for both.
LMArena Elo · higher is better
Scale starts at 1040 Elo
1480.2
Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better
$2.00/M
LMArena Elo · higher is better
Scale starts at 1040 Elo
1489.7
Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better
$2.00/M
Muse Spark 1.1 takes text, image, video, file, audio, returns up to 943,718 tokens from a 1,048,576-token context, and is listed by 1 seller.
Compared against 136 rated, priced models on this lens: 1 model dominates it and gives up nothing, 2 more dominate it but give something up. Muse Spark 1.1 scores 1480.2 at $2.00 per million tokens for this mix.
Envelope-safe replacements
Each row scores at least as high, costs no more, and covers this model’s context, output, modalities, tools, and reasoning. A cheaper narrower model is not listed here.
| Model | LMArena | Effective $/M | You save |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 | 1489.7 +9.5 | $2.00/M | 0% |
Higher score, lower price, named losses
Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.
| Model | LMArena | Effective $/M | You give up |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 1494.7 | $1.50/M | max output |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash | 1490.5 | $1.50/M | max output |
The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.
Saved decision references
Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.
Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.
Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.