---
title: "Trail of Bits Differential Security Review: review, setup & limitations · Undominated.ai"
canonical: https://undominated.ai/skills/trailofbits-differential-review/
description: "Reviews security-relevant changes against their baseline, removed protections, callers and concrete attacker scenarios."
---

# Trail of Bits Differential Security Review: review, setup & limitations · Undominated.ai

> Reviews security-relevant changes against their baseline, removed protections, callers and concrete attacker scenarios.

[← Explore all skills](/skills/)

SECURITY / Trail of Bits

# Trail of Bits Differential Security Review

Reviews security-relevant changes against their baseline, removed protections, callers and concrete attacker scenarios.

 See setup guidance ↓Original source ↗

SOURCE REVIEW

 Reviewed 2026-09-21
 Evidence 7 linked sources
 Publisher Trail of Bits
 Licence CC-BY-SA-4.0 ↗
 Revision 123037ec8aed
 Read what was—and wasn’t—checked ↓

“Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks”

 Trail of Bits · upstream description ↗ Our analysis follows below.

01 / THE REASONING

## Why this made the selection.

 - Uses git history to ask why a removed check existed and whether a previous fix is being undone.
- Requires findings tied to lines and commits and a saved report with stated coverage limits.

### A good fit for

 - Reviewing a pull request that changes authorization or data validation
- Investigating security regressions in a patch

### Weigh up before choosing

 - The methodology includes checking out the baseline and head; use a suitable worktree so the review does not disrupt uncommitted work.
- Its grep-based caller counts and test searches are heuristics, not a resolved call graph or measured test coverage.
- Risk-based triage can leave lower-priority paths unexamined; the final coverage statement matters.

02 / THE REVIEW RECORD

## What we actually inspected.

Source review has boundaries. A clear record is more useful than a “safe” badge.

### Material inspected

 - plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/SKILL.md
- plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/methodology.md
- plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/reporting.md
- plugins/differential-review/agents/adversarial-modeler.md
- LICENSE

### Our findings

 - The inspected methodology connects baseline inspection, changed-code review, test evidence and transitive effects.
- High-risk work can use the plugin’s namespaced adversarial-modeler agent, which needs the full plugin.
- The reporting guide asks for exploit prerequisites, impact and evidence rather than a bare severity label.

### Not established by this review

 - Source inspection only; no skill installation or workflow execution was performed.

The review applies to the material and revision named here. A newer upstream release can change its behavior.

03 / PUT IT TO WORK

## Add a skill to your workflow.

Upstream setup instructions ↗
 - Install the complete differential-review plugin, including its agents, workflows and references.
- Claude Code: add the trailofbits/skills marketplace with /plugin marketplace add trailofbits/skills, then select the plugin in /plugin menu.
- The publisher also documents Codex marketplace compatibility; confirm the required workflow and delegation capabilities in the chosen host.

### Before you start

 - A supported Claude Code or Codex plugin host
- Permission for the plugin’s repository reads, outputs and any requested test commands
- A baseline revision and an appropriate clean or isolated working tree

### Compatibility

Claude Code and documented Codex plugin compatibility · Git repositories with a meaningful baseline

### Read diffs, history, callers and tests

 - Read diffs, history, callers and tests
- Run git commands that can change the checked-out revision
- Write review reports and optionally run authorized validation

### Cost model

The package uses CC-BY-SA terms; agent review and any validation infrastructure are separate costs.

04 / FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

## The source trail.

Our notes are separate from the original resource. Check upstream before adopting a new version.

 - Skill definition at reviewed revision ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/SKILL.md Supports: summary, upstreamDescription, whySelected, bestFor, limitations, review, compatibility, access
- Reviewed reference or helper: methodology.md ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/methodology.md Supports: review, limitations, access
- Reviewed reference or helper: reporting.md ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/plugins/differential-review/skills/differential-review/reporting.md Supports: review, limitations, access
- Reviewed reference or helper: ../../agents/adversarial-modeler.md ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/plugins/differential-review/agents/adversarial-modeler.md Supports: review, limitations, access
- Upstream license or licensing declaration ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/LICENSE Supports: license
- Publisher installation and project documentation ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/123037ec8aed26f0d86327cc39137ee5043e5deb/README.md Supports: install, compatibility, access
- Skills installer source formats and selective installation ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/vercel-labs/skills/blob/7407f3893ad4dceab546ac002c3ef806e4000c73/README.md Supports: install

KEEP COMPARING

## Other approaches to consider.

Related by category or shared topics. These are alternatives to inspect, not a measured quality order.

 [### OpenAI Codex Security Threat Model ↗ Creates or reuses a repository threat model bound to the actual target and revision, preserving supplied context and explicit review gaps.](/skills/openai-threat-model/)[### Trail of Bits Audit Context Building ↗ Builds a cited dossier of function invariants, assumptions and dependencies before a separate vulnerability-hunting pass.](/skills/trailofbits-audit-context-building/)[### Trail of Bits Sharp Edges ↗ Examines APIs and configuration for cases where ordinary developer mistakes can disable a security boundary.](/skills/trailofbits-sharp-edges/)

 [AI Tools ↗](/tools/)[Skills ↗](/skills/)[Agents ↗](/agents/)[MCP Servers ↗](/mcp-servers/)
