---
title: "Sentry Find Bugs: review, setup & limitations · Undominated.ai"
canonical: https://undominated.ai/skills/getsentry-find-bugs/
description: "Reviews a branch diff against surrounding code and existing tests, reporting only substantiated issues and explicit coverage limits."
---

# Sentry Find Bugs: review, setup & limitations · Undominated.ai

> Reviews a branch diff against surrounding code and existing tests, reporting only substantiated issues and explicit coverage limits.

[← Explore all skills](/skills/)

TESTING AND RELIABILITY / Sentry

# Sentry Find Bugs

Reviews a branch diff against surrounding code and existing tests, reporting only substantiated issues and explicit coverage limits.

 See setup guidance ↓Original source ↗

SOURCE REVIEW

 Reviewed 2026-09-21
 Evidence 6 linked sources
 Publisher Sentry
 Licence Apache-2.0 ↗
 Revision c2f99a5b04b4
 Read what was—and wasn’t—checked ↓

“Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit”

 Sentry · upstream description ↗ Our analysis follows below.

01 / THE REASONING

## Why this made the selection.

 - Requires the complete diff to be read before findings and follows changed behavior into surrounding implementations and tests.
- Each candidate issue must survive a check for existing handling; the report records what was reviewed and what remains unverified.

### A good fit for

 - A focused review of committed branch changes
- Checking whether a suspected regression is already handled elsewhere

### Weigh up before choosing

 - The initial command compares committed branch history and omits uncommitted edits; inspect those separately if they are in scope.
- It assumes GitHub CLI access and a usable local base branch. Its security checklist is not a complete security audit.
- Reading current files is not a substitute for a truncated diff: recover omitted and deleted hunks before treating the branch review as complete.

02 / THE REVIEW RECORD

## What we actually inspected.

Source review has boundaries. A clear record is more useful than a “safe” badge.

### Material inspected

 - skills/find-bugs/SKILL.md
- README.md (installation, compatibility and licence sections)
- LICENSE

### Our findings

 - The complete definition instructs a read-only review and asks for file/line evidence and concrete fixes rather than speculative issue lists.
- The default-branch lookup uses gh, while the diff uses local git state; missing or stale base refs need resolution before relying on coverage.

### Not established by this review

 - No branch review or vulnerability validation was run.
- GitHub authentication and base-ref availability were not exercised.

The review applies to the material and revision named here. A newer upstream release can change its behavior.

03 / PUT IT TO WORK

## Add a skill to your workflow.

Upstream setup instructions ↗

DOCUMENTED COMMAND

 npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/skills/tree/c2f99a5b04b4cd992ec3022d7c2c3e23e938d241/skills/find-bugs Copy command ↗

Copying does not execute this command. It may retrieve a newer version than the reviewed source.

 - Install the find-bugs directory and keep the branch/base context explicit.
- State whether the review includes working-tree changes; the supplied branch-diff command does not include them.
- Choose the intended host and project scope in the installer. The source revision is pinned; the installer itself is not executed or version-pinned by this review.

### Before you start

 - Node.js/npm and git for the documented Skills installer
- A git checkout with the intended comparison base
- Authenticated GitHub CLI for the supplied default-branch discovery command

### Compatibility

Claude Code · Cursor · Cline · GitHub Copilot

### Local git and GitHub repository metadata

 - Read branch diffs, source files and tests
- Query repository metadata through GitHub CLI; the skill explicitly says not to edit files

### Cost model

Apache-licensed instructions; agent usage and any associated private-repository access follow their respective services.

04 / FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

## The source trail.

Our notes are separate from the original resource. Check upstream before adopting a new version.

 - Skill definition at reviewed revision ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/getsentry/skills/blob/c2f99a5b04b4cd992ec3022d7c2c3e23e938d241/skills/find-bugs/SKILL.md Supports: summary, upstreamDescription, whySelected, bestFor, limitations, review, access
- Publisher installation, compatibility and licensing guidance ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/getsentry/skills/blob/c2f99a5b04b4cd992ec3022d7c2c3e23e938d241/README.md Supports: install, compatibility, access, license
- Upstream licence at reviewed revision ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/getsentry/skills/blob/c2f99a5b04b4cd992ec3022d7c2c3e23e938d241/LICENSE Supports: license, access.cost
- Skills installer: source formats and repeated skill selection ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/vercel-labs/skills/blob/7407f3893ad4dceab546ac002c3ef806e4000c73/README.md Supports: install
- Skills installer: full commit SHA checkout support ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/vercel-labs/skills/blob/7407f3893ad4dceab546ac002c3ef806e4000c73/src/git.ts Supports: install
- Skills installer: tree revision and subdirectory parsing ↗ Checked 2026-09-21 https://github.com/vercel-labs/skills/blob/7407f3893ad4dceab546ac002c3ef806e4000c73/src/source-parser.ts Supports: install

KEEP COMPARING

## Other approaches to consider.

Related by category or shared topics. These are alternatives to inspect, not a measured quality order.

 [### Bug Receipt ↗ Creates an evidence-bearing defect or incident handoff that distinguishes verified, partial and blocked outcomes.](/skills/github-bug-receipt/)[### Diagnosing Bugs ↗ A debugging procedure that establishes a reproducible symptom, tests competing explanations and preserves a regression check.](/skills/mattpocock-diagnosing-bugs/)[### Superpowers Receiving Code Review ↗ Checks review feedback against the code and project constraints before making and testing each requested change.](/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/)

 [AI Tools ↗](/tools/)[Skills ↗](/skills/)[Agents ↗](/agents/)[MCP Servers ↗](/mcp-servers/)
