# Documentation edit review

Blank working document. Replace placeholders with your own evidence; an empty field is unknown, not a passing result.

Owner: [fill in]
Source revision: [fill in]
Environment: [fill in]
Evidence date: [fill in]

## Scope

Assigned files/revision: ___
Audience/style: ___
Technical reference: ___
Protected qualifiers/defaults/warnings: ___

## Semantic diff

| Original meaning | Proposed wording | Source check | Reviewer decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ___ | ___ | ___ | pending |

## Accessibility and rendering

Heading outline: ___
Descriptive-link checks: ___
Image inspected and proposed alt: ___
Linter/version/output, if run: ___

## Publication handoff

Unresolved meaning changes: ___
Rendered preview evidence: ___
New examples and their evidence: ___
Requested publication destination/action: ___

## Boundaries

- The readability profile asks for pull-request submission and declares broad tools; downloading it does not authorise publication.

- The Markdown accessibility profile covers selected practices, not full accessibility conformance. Its npx linter may download code; alt text and meaning changes need deliberate review.

Workflow: https://undominated.ai/workflows/#edit-docs-without-losing-meaning

Original worksheet: MIT. Linked resources retain their own licences and setup requirements.