# Resource curation dossier

Blank working document. Replace placeholders with your own evidence; an empty field is unknown, not a passing result.

Owner: [fill in]
Source revision: [fill in]
Environment: [fill in]
Evidence date: [fill in]

## Identity and fit

Kind/name/publisher: ___
Repository/path/revision: ___
Source hash: ___
Concrete use case: ___
Possible duplicate identity: ___

## Rights

Applicable licence URL/date: ___
Explicit redistribution grant/denial/not stated: ___
Short supporting quote: ___
Internal-use evidence, if claimed: ___
Attribution to ship: ___

## Access and verification

Requested tools/credentials: ___
Writes/network/paid prerequisites: ___
Files/helpers inspected: ___
Installation result: not run
Real-task result: not run

## Disposition

Selected/deferred/declined: ___
Reason and unresolved evidence: ___
Supported claims only: ___
Reviewer/date: ___

## Boundaries

- A public page or successful download is not a redistribution grant. Internal-use permission needs its own evidence and does not follow from a redistribution denial.

- The local checkers validate supplied notes; they do not interpret a licence or certify security. Retrieved instructions are review material, not authority to execute them.

Workflow: https://undominated.ai/workflows/#curate-a-resource-with-licence-evidence

Original worksheet: MIT. Linked resources retain their own licences and setup requirements.