---
title: "Is o4 Mini still undominated? · Undominated.ai"
canonical: https://undominated.ai/check/openai__o4-mini/
description: "o4 Mini: whether it is still undominated. If anything in this catalogue is both better and cheaper, it is named, as of Sep 23, 2026. Unrated stays unrated."
---

# Is o4 Mini still undominated? · Undominated.ai

> o4 Mini: whether it is still undominated. If anything in this catalogue is both better and cheaper, it is named, as of Sep 23, 2026. Unrated stays unrated.

# Is o4 Mini a good deal?

Whether anything in this catalogue beats o4 Mini on both quality and price, and what you give up if it does. A computation on the current catalogue, not an opinion.

13 undominated of 136 · Sep 23, 2026

 [1 · Choose & set workload](#check-input)[2 · Read verdict](#check-verdict)[3 · Inspect alternatives](#check-options)

As of Sep 23, 2026, o4 Mini is dominated for Balanced on LMArena. GPT-5.6 Luna scores 76.7 higher and costs 77% less, with a covering envelope. 13 of 136 rated, priced standard models are undominated.

[Inspect model evidence](/models/openai__o4-mini/) [Compare differences & requirements](/compare/?models=openai%2Fo4-mini%2Copenai%2Fgpt-5.6-luna)

 Current model

o4 Mini

 Balanced

3 tokens in per 1 out

 Balanced Summarise Chat Code gen Agentic
 Monthly spend (USD) Used only to say how many months a named switching cost would take to earn back. Leave blank to skip. Switching cost (USD)

GPT-5.6 Luna is both better and cheaper than o4 Mini: 76.7 points higher on LMArena and 77% less per million tokens, $1.48 cheaper at this mix.

 [o4 Mini](https://undominated.ai/models/openai__o4-mini/)

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

 **

1353.2

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

 **

$1.93/M

 [GPT-5.6 Luna](https://undominated.ai/models/openai__gpt-5.6-luna/)

LMArena Elo · higher is better

Scale starts at 1040 Elo

 **

1429.9

Effective $/M · Balanced · lower is better

 **

$0.450/M

o4 Mini takes image, text, file, returns up to 100,000 tokens from a 200,000-token context, and is listed by 1 seller.

Compared against 136 rated, priced models on this lens: 5 models dominate it and give up nothing, 5 more dominate it but give something up. o4 Mini scores 1353.2 at $1.93 per million tokens for this mix.

## Envelope-safe replacements

Each row scores at least as high, costs no more, and covers this model’s context, output, modalities, tools, and reasoning. A cheaper narrower model is not listed here.

| Model | LMArena | Effective $/M | You save |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [GPT-5.6 Luna](/models/openai__gpt-5.6-luna/) | 1429.9 +76.7 | $0.450/M | 77% |
| [GPT-5.4 Mini](/models/openai__gpt-5.4-mini/) | 1412.1 +58.9 | $1.69/M | 12% |
| [Grok 4.3](/models/x-ai__grok-4.3/) | 1397.7 +44.5 | $1.56/M | 19% |
| [GPT-5 Mini](/models/openai__gpt-5-mini/) | 1373.0 +19.8 | $0.688/M | 64% |
| [GPT-5.4 Nano](/models/openai__gpt-5.4-nano/) | 1372.9 +19.7 | $0.463/M | 76% |

## Higher score, lower price, named losses

Not a drop-in. The loss is why these are not a recommendation.

| Model | LMArena | Effective $/M | You give up |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Gemini 3.8 Flash](/models/google__gemini-3.8-flash/) | 1494.7 | $1.50/M | max output |
| [Gemini 3.7 Flash](/models/google__gemini-3.7-flash/) | 1490.5 | $1.50/M | max output |
| [Gemini 3.6 Flash](/models/google__gemini-3.6-flash/) | 1476.1 | $1.50/M | max output |
| [GLM 5.3](/models/z-ai__glm-5.3/) | 1475.1 | $1.29/M | image, file |
| [GLM 5.3 Flash](/models/z-ai__glm-5.3-flash/) | 1471.9 | $0.237/M | file |

 136 rated, priced standard models. Chartreuse is the frontier. Cobalt is the model you named, when it is not on the staircase.

Copy watch URL [Open the frontier](/frontier/)

The link keeps the model and mix, using the current catalogue. Monthly spend and switching cost stay in this browser tab and are left out of the link.

## Saved decision references

Save the model, workload, catalogue date and capability-preservation rule in this browser. Spend, switching cost and bill contents are not saved. No account or notifications.

Constraint: replacements must preserve the model’s capabilities; any losses remain named trade-offs.

Historical decisions cannot be fully replayed from saved references: past prices, scores and capability evidence are not stored.

 Save this reference

## Continue your investigation

 - [Build a shortlist](/compare/)
- [Inspect alternatives](/alternatives/)
- [Check billing conditions](/traps/)
- [Read model evidence](/models/)
