---
title: "Compare alternatives to Qwen3 32B · Undominated.ai"
canonical: https://undominated.ai/alternatives/qwen__qwen3-32b/
description: "10 alternatives score at least as high as Qwen3 32B and cost no more under at least one listed workload. 9 preserve recorded capabilities; 1 have named trade-offs."
---

# Compare alternatives to Qwen3 32B · Undominated.ai

> 10 alternatives score at least as high as Qwen3 32B and cost no more under at least one listed workload. 9 preserve recorded capabilities; 1 have named trade-offs.

# Alternatives to Qwen3 32B

Qwen · LMArena 1340.1 · $0.130/M on a balanced workload · prices as of 2026-10-06

 [Compare models](https://undominated.ai/compare/) Comparison context

Choose up to three standard models in Compare.

Requirements and prompt length apply in Compare. This page keeps its stated price basis and workload controls.

## 9 models are higher-scoring or cheaper, with neither dimension worse.

Of the 144 models carrying both an independent score and a published price at the same delivery mode, **10** score at least as high as Qwen3 32B and cost no more under at least one listed workload, with at least one of those dimensions improved. **9** match or beat its recorded context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and extended reasoning. **1** has a recorded capability loss, named on every row.

Dominance is not a property of a model. It is a property of a model, a capability lens and a workload, and all three are named on every row. Scores are LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset; prices are blended per million tokens. A higher score is not a drop-in replacement.

This page is built only while a candidate improves score or price without worsening the other under a listed workload. When that comparison no longer holds, it is not generated.

## Where it holds

| Workload | Qwen3 32B $/M | Recorded capabilities preserved | Recorded capability losses |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Balanced | $0.130 | 4 | 1 |
| Summarise | $0.090 | 6 | 1 |
| Chat | $0.160 | 6 | 1 |
| Code gen | $0.200 | 3 | 1 |
| Agentic | $0.110 | 9 | 1 |

Workload mixes are defined on the [methodology page](/methodology/). Cached input is priced at the cached rate, and reasoning tokens at the worse of the reasoning and output rates.

## What you would be replacing

| Intelligence | 1340.1 |
| --- | --- |
| Context window | 131K |
| Max output | 16K |
| Input modes | text |
| Tool use | yes |
| Extended reasoning | yes |

Preserving recorded capabilities requires matching or beating these fields. [Full record for Qwen3 32B](/models/qwen__qwen3-32b/), or [check Qwen3 32B against the whole catalogue](/check/qwen__qwen3-32b/).

## Recorded capabilities preserved 9

Each option has a higher score or a lower price, with neither dimension worse under the listed workloads. It matches or beats Qwen3 32B on recorded context, maximum output, input modes, tool use and extended reasoning.

| # | Model | Intelligence | $/M | Holds under |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Gemma 4 26B A4B](/models/google__gemma-4-26b-a4b-it/) Google | 1433.9 +93.8 | $0.127 | Balanced −3% Summarise −23% Chat −7% Agentic −27% |
| 2 | [DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423](/models/deepseek__deepseek-v4-flash/) DeepSeek | 1432.1 +92 | $0.113 | Balanced −13% Summarise −18% Chat −35% Code gen −31% Agentic −45% |
| 3 | [Qwen3.5-Flash](/models/qwen__qwen3.5-flash-02-23/) Qwen | 1397 +56.9 | $0.114 | Balanced −13% Summarise −17% Chat −11% Code gen −9% Agentic −14% |
| 4 | [gpt-oss-120b](/models/openai__gpt-oss-120b/) OpenAI | 1365.4 +25.3 | $0.065 | Balanced −50% Summarise −59% Chat −46% Code gen −43% Agentic −54% |
| 5 | [DeepSeek V4.1 Flash](/models/deepseek__deepseek-v4.1-flash/) DeepSeek | 1462.5 +122.4 | $0.067 summarise | Summarise −26% Agentic −5% |
| 6 | [MiMo-V2.6-Flash](/models/xiaomi__mimo-v2.6-flash/) Xiaomi | 1456.4 +116.3 | $0.155 chat | Chat −3% Agentic −28% |
| 7 | [MiMo-V2.5](/models/xiaomi__mimo-v2.5/) Xiaomi | 1427.5 +87.4 | $0.155 chat | Chat −3% Agentic −28% |
| 8 | [GPT-6 Luna](/models/openai__gpt-6-luna/) OpenAI | 1391.5 +51.4 | $0.106 agentic | Agentic −3% |
| 9 | [GLM 4.7 Flash](/models/z-ai__glm-4.7-flash/) Z.ai | 1350.9 +10.8 | $0.063 summarise | Summarise −30% Agentic −26% |

## Alternatives with recorded capability losses 1

These improve score or price without worsening the other under the listed workloads, but reduce at least one recorded capability. Read the last column before switching.

| Model | Intelligence | $/M | Holds under | Recorded capability loss |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Gemma 3 27B](/models/google__gemma-3-27b-it/) Google | 1357.8 +17.7 | $0.100 | Balanced −23% Summarise −7% Chat −30% Code gen −36% Agentic −16% | no extended reasoning |

## What this compares, and what it leaves out

 - Quality is LMArena Elo, used under CC BY 4.0 from the official dataset. The 95% confidence interval on a difference between two scores is about ±10.47 points, so a gap smaller than that is marked *tie* rather than an improvement — see [significance bands](/significance/).
 - 204 further models at this delivery mode carry a price but no independent score. They are absent from the comparison in both directions — unrated is not a zero, and an unmeasured model is neither an alternative nor a worse buy.
 - Retired models are never offered as an alternative, and a model only competes against its own delivery mode: batch trades latency for price, so it is not a like-for-like swap.
 - Nothing here measures latency, throughput, rate limits or how a model behaves on your prompts. Two models with the same index score are not interchangeable.
 - Models with no higher-scoring or cheaper alternative that is no worse on the other axis are on the [value frontier](/frontier/). Models with such an alternative are [listed here](/alternatives/).

## Continue your investigation

 - [Check requirements](/check/)
- [Compare exact differences](/compare/)
- [Set a quality floor](/cheapest-at/)
- [Inspect tier boundaries](/cliffs/)